University of Missouri Links
Home
Faculty and Staff
Patient Care
Research
Residency
Medical Students
Employee Benefits
University of MO Health Care
Related Sites
ThinkFirst Missouri
Research

Research Proposal:
The effect of gait training to improve walking performance in older men and women using the AutoAmbulator™.

Principal Investigator:
Stephen Sayers, Ph.D., University of Missouri, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions

Study Physician:
Joseph Burris, M.D., University of Missouri, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Funding Source: HealthSouth Corporation

Funding Period: November 1, 2005 – October 31, 2006

Specific Aim:
To examine whether robotic, gait-assisted therapy can improve mobility in older adults with walking limitations.

Hypothesis:
A progressive mobility-training intervention using the AutoAmbulator™ will improve clinical measures of gait and mobility performance compared to conventional training.

Study Rationale:
America is rapidly aging, with more than 35 million men and women 65 years of age or older, and this number is expected to double by the year 2030. Currently, more than 5 million older adults have a physical disability, and with the demographic shift toward an aging population, these numbers will likely increase. Older adults with disabilities related to walking are less likely to maintain independence and have higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Reducing mobility limitations could have a large public health impact by keeping older adults living independently within the community.

Currently, conventional exercise interventions such as resistance training, overground training and balance training have demonstrated little effectiveness at improving mobility in older adults with walking limitations. Because coordination and movement speed deteriorate with age, conventional exercise performed by older adults at slower speeds may not be specific to the requirements of various mobility tasks. Robotic, gait-assisted therapy, which facilitates the appropriate gait patterns and movement speeds necessary for successful ambulation, has the potential to be a highly successful method to improve mobility in older adults.

Research Proposal:
Testosterone Screening among Men with Spinal Cord Injury

Principal Investigator:
Laura Schopp, Ph.D., Department of Health Psychology, School of Health Professions

Study Physician:
Mike Acuff, M.D., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine

Funding Source:
Spinal Cord Injuries Research Program, Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs, University of Missouri-Columbia

Funding Period: March 1, 2005 – February 28, 2006

Abstract:
Low testosterone levels may cause decreased energy levels and psychosocial well-being. These factors negatively affect rehabilitation success and long-term well-being. Although research has found that 16 to 100 percent of men with spinal cord injuries have low levels of total testosterone, other studies have not found differences between men with spinal cord injuries and those without injuries. The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to report the total testosterone levels of men with spinal cord injuries admitted to four acute inpatient rehabilitation centers. A secondary research question is to identify sociodemographic, medical and injury variables related to low total testosterone levels. Men who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled from the following Missouri facilities: Rusk Rehabilitation Center in Columbia, Missouri Rehabilitation Center in Mt. Vernon, St. John’s Regional Health Center in Springfield, and Sisters of Saint Mary (SSM) Rehabilitation in St. Louis. The research participants will receive a total testosterone blood test and a chart review will be conducted to obtain demographic, injury, and medical data. The frequency and percentage of participants with low testosterone levels will be identified. Sociodemographic, injury and medical variables associated with low testosterone levels will be collected also. This study will provide information that may influence the medical treatment of persons with SCI.

Research Proposal:
High Velocity Resistance Training in Older Men and Women

Principal Investigator:
Stephen P. Sayers, Ph.D., Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions

Study Physician:
Martin K. Childers, D.O., Ph.D., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine

Funding Source: NIH (R03)

Award Number: 1 R03 AG025141

Funding Period: February 1, 2005 – January 31, 2007

Specific Aim:
The primary aim of this research is to examine the efficacy of a novel RT protocol in functionally limited older adults at risk for subsequent physical disability. Specific aims are to: 1) examine velocity training in older adults to determine its effect on strength, velocity and muscle power output at various functional resistances, and 2) examine velocity training in older adults to determine its effect on functional performance and physical disability compared to traditional strength training.

Research Proposal:
Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis with High Velocity Resistance

Principal Investigator:
Stephen P. Sayers, Ph.D., Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions

Study Physician:
Martin K. Childers, D.O., Ph.D., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine

Funding Source: Arthritis Foundation

Funding Period: January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2006

Short Abstract:
The number one medical condition in the U.S. contributing to more chronic disability in older adults is knee osteoarthritis (OA). A primary focus of rehabilitation in older adults with OA has been strength training using moderate to heavy resistance. Yet, this traditional approach has been shown to improve functioning in only some studies, and these effects have been small to moderate. Several of our studies suggest that the speed at which muscles move is more important to performing functional tasks than how strong the muscles are. We plan to explore a unique weight-training program for men and women 65 years or older that stresses high speed training using moderate resistance. We will compare high speed weight-training with traditional strength training in 53 older men and women with knee OA to determine which method has the greatest effects on muscle strength, speed of movement, functional performance, physical disability, and joint pain and stiffness. We believe that high speed training may change the way weight-training exercise is practiced in the community and prescribed in the clinic for older adults with knee OA.

Research Proposal:
High Speed Resistance Training in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis

Principal Investigator:
Stephen P. Sayers, Ph.D., Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions

Study Physician:
Martin K. Childers, D.O., Ph.D., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine

Funding Source: American College of Rheumatology Research & Education Foundation

Funding Period: January 1, 2006 – December 31, 2007

Abstract:
Resistance training with a strengthening component has been a primary focus of knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation; however, traditional resistance training has demonstrated only modest effects on measures of function, pain, and disability. Data now suggest speed of movement (velocity) may exert beneficial effects on the arthritic knee compared to slow speed contractions and may be more important to functional performance than strength. The proposed study will compare velocity training to traditional resistance training in a randomized, single-blind controlled intervention trial consisting of a 12-week laboratory-based resistance training intervention followed by 3 months of self-directed exercise. 53 men and women 65 years or older with knee osteoarthritis will be randomized into one of three groups, velocity, training, strength training, or control. Training will consist of 3 sets of 8-10 repetitions at 40% (velocity training) or 80% (strength training) of maximal strength using leg press and knee extension exercises 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The control group will perform lower extremity range of motion and flexibility exercises twice per week. Baseline measures of muscle strength, power, contraction velocity, functional performance, and self-reported pain and disability will be collected prior to randomization. Changes in these outcome measures will be compared among groups at 12 weeks and at 3-months follow-up. To test the hypothesis that there will be differences across groups, a 3x3 (group x time) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures over time will be used for each dependent variable. Statistical significance will be accepted at p<0.05. There is a critical need to investigate alternatives to traditional strength training and identify the most appropriate strategy to improve measures of function and disability and reduce pain in this population. These findings could change the way resistance training exercise is practiced in the community and prescribed in the clinic.

Research Proposal:
Graduate Psychology Education Program

Principal Investigator:
George Johnstone, Ph.D., Department of Health Psychology, School of Health Professions

Study Physician:
Robert R. Conway, M.D., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine

Funding Source: Health Resources Service Administration (HRSA)

Funding Period: September 1, 2004 – August 31, 2007

Purpose:
Consistent with the goals of Healthy People 2010 (Chapter 6), the purpose of the Rural Missouri Rehabilitation Psychology Internship Program is to improve the health outcomes of persons with disabilities, and increase their access to psychological services in rural areas.

Objectives:
1) Improve access to quality health care through appropriate preparation of rehabilitation psychologists, pediatric neuropsychologists, and adult neuropsychologists to support quality primary care in underserved, rural counties of Missouri; and 2) Improve access to a diverse and culturally competent and sensitive psychology workforce in rural areas by a) increasing the number of minority interns; and b) providing training in rural cultural issues through didactics and clinical practicum with rural interdisciplinary health care teams.

Need:
There are an estimated 54 million Americans with disabilities, many who are in need of psychological services, and particularly in rural areas. Although 32% of Missourians (1.7 million people) live in rural counties, there are only 11 board certified rehabilitation/neuropsychologists in the state (only 1 in a rural county). Although the MU Department of Health Psychology (DHP) has been the primary training site in Missouri for rehabilitation/neuropsychologists since 1986, the DHP has not been able to fund interns since 2000 because of intern billing restrictions.

Curriculum/Experiential Training:
Interns will participate in one of three training tracks: a) pediatric neuropsychology; b) adult neuropsychology; or c) rehabilitation psychology. The training year will be divided into 3 major rotations (75% effort, 4 months duration) and 2 minor rotations (25% effort, 6 months duration). All clinical and didactic training is interdisciplinary (i.e., physicians; rehabilitation therapists; vocational counselors; school staff, etc.). Interns will participate in all APA Accredited Missouri Health Sciences Psychology Consortium training experiences, including DHP didactics, which follow APA Division 22 and 40 training guidelines.

Setting:
The primary training will occur at Rusk Rehabilitation Center (RRC), a 60 bed inpatient rehabilitation center that serves the primarily rural counties of central Missouri, and the Missouri Rehabilitation Center (MRC) in Mt Vernon, a 136 bed inpatient rehabilitation hospital in one of the most rural areas of Missouri. Trainees will also provide psychological services to 6 state Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) offices in rural Missouri, which serve 37 rural counties, 28 of which are in Medically Underserved Areas.

Resources:
Interns will have access to all the resources of the APA Accredited Missouri Health Psychology Consortium; MU Health Care System (Schools of Medicine, Nursing, Health Professions); Rusk Rehabilitation Center; and the Missouri Rehabilitation Center.

Faculty Supervisors:
Interns will be supervised by the10 DHP faculty members, including 6 board certified rehabilitation/neuropsychologists (over 50% of board certified NP/RP in MO).

Evaluation:
The program will be evaluated in terms of the number of interns who complete the internship; the number eventually employed in rural areas, and a qualitative assessment by referral sources, rural agencies, and other rural community stakeholders.

Research Proposal:
Leupeptin in a Canine Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Principal Investigator:
Martin K. Childers, D.O., Ph.D., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine

Co-PI: Joe Kornegay, Ph.D.

Funding Source: NIH (1 R21 NS050135)

Funding Period: July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2007

Purpose:
This study seeks to determine efficacy of the calpain inhibitor, leupeptin, in the treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) using a canine model.

Research Proposal:
Center for Religion, the Professions, and the Public

Principal Investigator:
Edmund Lambeth, Director, Center for Religion, the Professions, and the Public

Study Physician: Jon Rupright, D.O., Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Funding Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts

Funding Period: March 1, 2006 – February 28, 2008

Purpose:
To strengthen religion journalism by research, student instruction, and creative activity that advance democratic values in the new century;

To foster constructive public discourse about issues of religion and public;

To foster research, teaching, and public dissemination of new knowledge and information about the relationship among religion, religiousness, and the coping abilities of persons disabled by long-term injuries and diseases – a pioneering direction in the scholarship and instruction related to spirituality and health. This goal is especially important as Americans live longer in a cultural environment of increased religious diversity;

To create an MU Consortium on Professional Ethics to provide settings to discuss issues and define questions for research and teaching that are non-sectarian in nature, but have engaged citizens concerned in various ways about the relationship of religion and public life.